Labelled Abduction and Relevance Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
The aim of this paper is to explore modelling a more non standard interaction between a human and a database We try to equip the database with the capability of understand ing queries in natural language and answering them in a more intelligent manner than by mere yes no factual answers This capability of the database requires at least two compo nents First the database must possess a front end logic module which can parse the natural language input I and translate it into a query or update QI in its own logical query lan guage Second and in fact more di cult it must cope with the logical patterns of human answer input query which is logically more non monotonic common sense than ordinary query languages In this paper we rst address the preliminary parsing translation component We present an approach to utterance interpretation which takes as input sequences of natural language words and builds linked labelled databases as output and also involves additional abductive choices which are made on line and captured through the labelling algebra We describe the outlines of the formal model we are developing and provide an experimental implementation of the on line construction of linked labelled databases and interpretation relative to a con text We then turn to discussion of the second component and consider in detail the formal properties of the abduction principles required to equip a database with the common sense faculties required to participate in question answering and dialogues
منابع مشابه
Counting Complexity of Propositional Abduction
Abduction is an important method of non-monotonic reasoning with many applications in AI and related topics. In this paper, we concentrate on propositional abduction, where the background knowledge is given by a propositional formula. Decision problems of great interest are the existence and the relevance problems. The complexity of these decision problems has been systematically studied while ...
متن کاملA creative abduction approach to scientific and knowledge discovery
In this paper we explore the range of applicability of abductive reasoning for knowledge discovery. In particular, we discuss a novel form of abduction, called creative abduction, where new knowledge is generated in the process of explaining observed events, and demonstrate its relevance to knowledge discovery. The main contribution of this paper is twofold: First, we show that creative abducti...
متن کاملAbduction of Linear Arithmetic Constraints
Abduction is usually carried out on partially-defined predicates. In this paper we investigate abduction applied to fully-defined predicates, specifically linear arithmetic constraints over the real numbers. Abduction in this context has application to query answering using views and type inference, and potential relevance to analysis of concurrent/constraint/logic programs. We show that only r...
متن کاملAbduction Framework for Repairing Incomplete EL Ontologies: Complexity Results and Algorithms
In this paper we consider the problem of repairing missing is-a relations in ontologies. We formalize the problem as a generalized TBox abduction problem (GTAP). Based on this abduction framework, we present complexity results for the existence, relevance and necessity decision problems for the GTAP with and without some specific preference relations for ontologies that can be represented using...
متن کاملPeirce and the Autonomy of Abductive Reasoning
Essential to Peirce's distinction among three kinds of reasoning, deduction, induction and abduction, is the claim that each is correlated to a unique species of validity irreducible to that of the others. In particular, abductive validity cannot be analyzed in either deductive or inductive terms, a consequence of considerable importance for the logical and epistemological scrutiny of scientifi...
متن کامل